HTMAP_CH5_1.jpg

Chapter 5

GOOD TAPE



The term has been around forever in radio, but was popularized in 2004 by Ira Glass, when he released a manifesto about making radio.

Radio nerds, and probably all storytellers in search of mastery, chase “good tape” obsessively.


This flexibility from the platform liberates the podcast producer to focus solely on “good tape,” instead of fitting a certain length or having to capture listeners mid-way through the episode. You know if someone is listening to your podcast, they chose to, and they probably have the time to finish in one sitting or to go back and listen more.

Since then, podcasting has stepped in and changed the medium-- the creator is no longer bound to a clock, to FCC rules, to air schedules. The listener can put on a podcast on a long drive, pause, go back and listen more while doing the dishes, pause, and then rewind at bed time and listen from the start with her partner.


HTMAP_CH5_2.jpg

So, how do you create good tape?  First, what is it?

Here’s Ira Glass’s manifesto for Transom.org that defines the idea. He breaks it down to action and reflection. Action is something that happened and reflection is the meaning imbued by you or the subject onto that action.


Though it might appear that good tape exists only in narrative podcasts, that’s not true. An extraordinary interview gets to good tape over and over again. The only difference is that you hear an edited version of the original two way.


HTMAP_CH5_3.jpg

How to interview to get to the meat and potatoes (+ veggies)

If you ask these questions during an interview, you’re more likely to get to good tape:

  • Describe it to me like a movie.

  • What did you say? How did they respond?

  • Could you stand up and show me what happened?

  • Walk me through it, one step at a time.

  • Why did you do that?

  • What did it feel like?

  • What was going through your head as that happened?

  • Where were you standing/sitting/laying, etc? Where was the action happening in relation to you?

  • What emotions were you feeling? Where in your body were you feeling them?

  • What were you wearing?

  • What were you seeing when you looked out?

  • What did it smell like? Taste like?

  • What were the sounds you were hearing? Can you imitate some of them?

  • When did you feel happiest during this experience?

  • When did you feel relieved during this experience? Sad? Afraid?

  • Did you know at the time what would happen?

  • What did it mean to you? (this is a reflection question)

  • How has this experience changed you? (so is this!)

  • Would you do things differently looking back? (and this!)

These are not all of the questions you should ask, but they are in the vein of questions you want to ask.


If you’re creating a fiction podcast, you may not be asking a real person with a real experience these questions, but you still want your characters to have answers to them. The more vivid each character’s experience, the more you can construct a detailed and artful plot around them.


HTMAP_CH5_6_EDIT.jpg

Listening to others

The best way to learn to interview is to listen to other people interview. I listen to the podcast How I Built This not only because I love hearing entrepreneurs talk about their process, but also because I see Guy Raz try different techniques from one episode to another. At some point later in the series, he started asking a question about luck and hard work, and having listened to interviews before that, it was particularly rewarding to hear him experiment.

Listen to this interview with Terry Gross on Longform podcast about her experience as an interviewer. Jesse Thorn interviews another skillful interviewer, Marc Maron, who has an entirely different style than Gross. You can listen to that conversation here (episode 14) or read it on Columbia Journalism Review. If neither Terry Gross nor Marc Maron are your style, watch this Jimmy Kimmel interview with Howard Stern. No matter what style of interviewing attracts you the most, there’s something to be learned from successful hosts. I listen to a show called Design Matters, where accomplished designer, Debbie Millman, conducts particularly visual interviews, whether she talks to designers or other creatives. Krista Tippett has a knack for getting into the nitty gritty of a person’s spirituality. Here’s her guide for how to be a good conversationalist.


HTMAP_CH5_4.jpg

Turning good tape into a story

Whether you’re making a narrative show where you chop that interview into bits and pieces, or you’re editing down the conversation for an interview show, the next step is to find an emotional arc. Take those nuggets of action and reflection and plot them along a narrative arc and an emotional arc. Narrative arc means a plot structure-- a beginning, a middle and an end. Emotional arc means a variation in emotion. The tone of a show can’t be sad or happy the whole time. It’s the change in emotion that gets the listener hooked. So, when does the action or reflection go from happy to sad or angry to nervous? This is another part of constructing a great show that comes from listening to others you want to imitate. Try plotting the narrative and emotional arc of your favorite podcasts, movies, TV shows and books to learn.

Jessica Able’s Out on the Wire is a deep dive into finding good tape, interviewing technique and building narrative arcs. It’s a beautifully done graphic novel that explores storytelling in radio. Here’s a publically available excerpt that breaks down how to decide what tape to keep and what tape to let go as you’re plotting into a story.

When Devon Taylor consulted on the first episode of Beginner as a story editor, she advised me to focus on tension when I plotted my scenes and reflection. To think in terms of but, therefore. By that I mean, you want to create a story that doesn’t just go from Scene I “and then” Scene II “and then” Scene III. Instead, you want to be able to put Scene I, “but” Scene II, “therefore” Scene III. This creates an interaction within the story that translates as tension, momentum, something to look forward to.


You can read Matt Stone and Trey Parker (yes, from South Park) talking about their “but, therefore” rule here. Or you can watch their New York Times video:


CHAPTER 4 • "THE BEST GEAR MONEY CAN BUY"

CHAPTER 6 • "SOUND AS A PLACE"